Total Pageviews

Follow by Email

Sunday, April 28, 2013


By Swapan Dasgupta

Since the Indian Parliament is lucky enough to have a quizmaster among its members, it would be instructive if he posed a perplexing question to a Government minister, preferably one whose answer is likely to be taken seriously. The question is this: If 19km of Chinese incursion into Indian territory leaves both the government and society completely unruffled, how much territory does Beijing have to occupy before the country feels well and truly shafted?

Maybe this question need not be confined to representatives of the UPA Government and the presiding deities of the so-called “strategic community” that are so visible in seminars and international airport lounges. This Saturday’s Delhi editions of the English language dailies were conspicuous by their perfunctory treatment of this official admission by the Defence Secretary to the parliamentary standing committee on defence. Only one publication chose to place this news on its front page; the rest chose to give greater play to the newest version of a mobile phone produced by Samsung.

Whether the relegation of the border tensions have anything to do with discreet suggestions from (what are quaintly described in media-speak as) ‘sources’, is a matter of conjecture. But as I have long maintained, the newshounds on the South Block beat have for long adjusted to their new role as stenographers to the Ministry of External Affairs. No wonder readers are compelled to digest a lot of gobble about “perceptional mismatch”, “calibrated” overtures and “nuanced” approaches to an opaque and inscrutable dispensation in Beijing. Thank God the TV channels are little less squeamish.

China, to its eternal credit, has very successfully created a mystique around itself. India’s China experts—with some honourable exceptions—have, by and large, devoured the piffle that is routinely dished out by its post-Confucian mandarins and, in fact, added their own sprinkling of soya sauce. Those who were exposed to China studies in the Indian Universities in the 1970s may recall the gush-gush endorsements of crazy schemes such as the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. The post-Mao U-turn should, ideally, have left them red-faced by the inclination to be Sinophiles, rather than Sinologists, had struck such deep roots that the shifting sands of China had little impact.

I recall attending a lecture by the notorious fellow-traveller Han Suyin at the London School of Economics sometime in the late-1970s where she held forth on the treachery of the Gang of Four, particularly Mao’s widow Jiang Quin. It was all very erudite and convincing until an insolent Briton stood up to remind her that barely a year or so ago she was singing praises of those very people she was now denouncing with gusto.

Actually, for the China-watchers, it is a simple case of access. Their profession demands frequent visits to China and it just doesn’t do to get on the wrong side of the present dispensation. And remember, China isn’t just another country: it is the most powerful nation of Asia blessed with an unflinching determination to restore its place as the Middle Kingdom. To many of China’s policy makers, India is a upstart that must periodically be shown its place. Certainly, Zhou Enlai was miffed by Jawaharlal Nehru’s condescension and waited for an opportune moment to deliver a tight slap in 1962.

The irony is that the greater the rebuff, the more India seems to come crawling. Nehru was probably the intellectual originator of the silly ‘Chindia’ thesis that subsequent fellow travellers such as Jairam Ramesh have taken such pains to propagate. Nehru’s anodyne Panchshila was located in a romantic version of post-colonial Asian resurgence. The tragedy was that lesser Nehruvians who were involved in Sino-Indian relations took exceptional care to ensure that ground realities were presented in such a way as to fit a grand theory. Sardar K.M. Panikkar who served as India’s Ambassador to China at a critical juncture may have been an erudite scholar but his total misreading of the fledgling Maoist regime owed a great deal to dissimulation. He presented a picture of China that Nehru wanted to hear.

This tradition of tailoring the message to suit the recipient appears to be continuing and, as usual, being packaged within a so-called strategic doctrine. Some of those entrusted with safeguarding India’s national security appear to be more concerned with getting their Mandarin pronunciation right when ordering Shark’s Fin soup than in penetrating the political fog that is allowed to engulf the Chinese establishment.

Yes, India cannot afford a military misadventure against a country that has larger capacity and depth. Ideally, it should avoid a second front. But that is no excuse to turn a blind eye to the demographic transformation of Tibet, the cyber terrorism that is periodically unleashed and China’s encouragement of Pakistan. Worse, in today’s context, there is no logic to replicating Nehru’s casual dismissal of the loss of Aksai Chin on the ground that “not a blade of grass” grows there.

There are a lot of little things India can do: lending a shoulder to countries such as Japan, Vietnam and even Singapore who are fearful of China’s hegemonism is just one of them. Maybe India has done these things in fits and starts. But all half-hearted initiatives have been overshadowed by the fact that whenever the Chinese dragon breathes fire, we run for cover, tail between legs. In the past week, India has exposed itself well and truly as a paper tiger. 

Sunday Pioneer, April 28, 2013


Prasanna said...

Dear Sir,
This is really a dangerous trend that we are seeing in our country. Earlier, our media used to take these illegal occupations seriously and report them prominently. Nowadays, even that is not happening. I am really concerned about the lack of pride that has grown in us over these years. Its also so disheartening to see our PM saying that this incursion is only a "local" issue and will be sorted out soon. How can he say that its a local issue?

There was a report that this incursion is likely related to a talk at the military level between the two armies in which china is asking India to provide its patrolling schedule on the border. When we are being bullied as a nation so openly, our PM says it is local issue.

Even countries like Maldives and Nepal are taking us lightly, without showing any minimum respect as a larger neighbor. Its not their fault, actually. If we do not care to assert ourselves correctly in the matters of national pride, who would take us seriously?

In total, I had great respect to Dr. Singh as an economist and an honest person. But the way he is clinging on to his post seems like he too is not any better than the rest of his partymen.

ajay bhandari said...

We will use this opportunity next time on a bigger stage seems to be the biggest problem

Anonymous said...

Have we forgotten the pledge to vacate every inch of our land from Chinese occupation.It seems our parliament is full of self seekers who cannot see thing in proper perspective being pygmy in their strategic thinking&stature.Even in foreign policy strategic planning is lacking and RAW has been decimated by our some of PM's.

Prasanta Das said...

Swapan Ji, Me is having little knowledge to comment on your article. I, as an ordinary citizen, am very much worried for casualness by entire country and not serious about entry of Chinese force in to the Indian Territory. In our country media plays a vital role for making the public aware on important issues, whether it is Anna Hazare's Loka Pal Bill or " Nirvay" rape case in Delhi. But in this critical moment media is not doing any significant job. In this shame ful situation country enjoys IPL cricket mach, and Country's Foreign Minister , Home Minister Vocal to Mr. Modi . Oposotion is also not showing the spirit of seriousness to bring the country united on this issue of Chinese aggression. I do not know how truth you will be finding on my expression, but it is most unacceptable truth.

DeeepFriedLife said...

What you wrote is as true as truth. And what I always feel about the way Indian system and Indian media works, mostly, is as short as short can be. We are a nation, which by all counts prove the theory of Randomness in nature to the maximum extent possible. I have never felt that we are a "system" and we have anything which works in a systematic and logical manner. We are just surviving as a natural phenomenon nothing more.

Jitendra Desai said...

Short of starting next Indo China war, can we not attempt other means? eg,
1.Declaring that Tibet is a disputed territory
2.Banning all imports from China
3.Telling ASEAN the same thing and improving strategic and business relations with Mongolia,Japan,Taiwan,S Korea,Vietnam,Thailand,Singapore,Myanmar.....
4.Tell Salman Khurshid to cancel his trip to Beijing
5.Tell Chinese Premier that he need not "stop over in Delhi" enroute his trip to Islamabad in May.

What if we too pitch those tents and start playing Bollywood music round the clock through loud speakers in lonely Ladakh?!
If we decide to "respond", there are ways and ways to do it.

Prof K C Mehta said...

Our China Policy is still over shadowed by the ostrich-like policy of Nehruvian era. When the then generals cautioned about inimical designs of China, both Nehru and Krishna Menon ridiculed the army commanders and faced the debacle of 1962.

manal dholakia said...

my you tube videos will change india's face.These videos are:-

THE SARDAR IS BACK( is for the corruption,fuel prices...

UNEMPLOYMENT'S MURDER( this is for unemployment & inflation...

INDIA'S RAPES( :-for the reduction of social crimes against women.

DR SINGH/ MR MODI( this is the miror of indian politics.