Total Pageviews

Follow by Email

Friday, November 1, 2013

Political versus Personal

By Swapan Dasgupta

Chief Minister of Bihar Nitish Kumar is an experienced and consummate politician with a firm grip on the administration of his economically backward state. As such, his speech to a Janata Dal (United) convention in Rajgir on October 29 was a masterly performance and constitutes the most coherent attack on the prime ministerial candidate of his erstwhile coalition partner, the Bharatiya Janata Party. Indeed, I would go so far as to suggest that his articulation of his scepticism of Narendra Modi was more effective than anything proffered by Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi and his colleagues in the Congress Party.

However, every political intervention has a context. In the case of the Bihar Chief Minister, that context was defined by the massive Hunkar rally addressed by Modi in Patna last Sunday. It was not merely Modi’s combative address and the fact that there were at least five lakh people from all over Bihar, not to mention the countless millions who heard his speech on television, which shaped Nitish’s response. Equally significant was the fact that the rally was conducted in the midst of serial blasts that left six people dead and nearly 100 people injured.

Having been at the rally and having observed the proceedings from a discreet corner of the large podium, I would suggest that it was nothing short of a miracle that the event did not end in a monumental tragedy where the casualty figures could have been horrific.

In planting 18 or more timer bombs at different parts of the large Gandhi Maidan, the activists of the Indian Mujahedeen—the believed perpetrators of the attack—had two principal objectives. First, they wanted to kill those who were unlucky enough to be situated near the explosion sites. More important, they placed the explosives in such a way as to create panic in the crowd and trigger a stampede that would undoubtedly have taken a larger toll. In the process, the rally would have had to be terminated abruptly, perhaps even before Modi had the opportunity of speaking to those who had come to cheer him enthusiastically. The aftermath of the chaos could even have led to rioting in the streets of Patna.

It is either fortuitous or even an act of providence that nearly half the low-intensity bombs failed to explode. For example, had the bomb which was placed just outside the ‘sanitised’ D-area exploded, the forward rush of a panic stricken crowd would have endangered the podium and could even have brought it crashing down.

The seriousness of the planned attack cannot be minimised and Nitish Kumar is too experienced an administrator not to have realised it. Predictably, there were fingers pointed at the state administration for the casualness with which it treated security arrangements for such a huge public meeting. The Bihar Chief Minister knew that the charges were grave, especially because there were intelligence inputs that suggested the Modi rally could be targeted by subversives who have scant respect for democratic traditions.

Under the circumstances, Nitish Kumar did what adroit, if cynical, politicians are prone to doing: diverting attention from his area of vulnerability. At Rajgir, he insisted that no intelligence alerts had been received and that, in any case, he had instructed his administration to take all necessary security arrangements. Having brushed off the charges levelled against him and his government, he proceeded to couch his opposition to Modi in hyperbolic overstatements. Modi, Nitish insisted, was not an ordinary politician: he was a fascist, a follower of Adolf Hitler who was prone to using the methods of Josef Goebbels to mislead people.

Mercifully, India has become accustomed to witnessing political attacks being laced with references from inter-war European history. In the mod-1970s, it was the Communist Party of India, then in alliance with Indira Gandhi thanks to Moscow’s strategic partnership with Delhi, which routinely labelled Jayaprakash Narayan a “fascist”. In the early-1990s that abuse was hurled at L.K. Advani in the wake of the Ayodhya movement. And today, Nitish Kumar has deemed it fit to use similar invectives against Modi.

Whether the popular yearning for a strong leader automatically reeks of fascism is a worthy subject of debate. However, whatever may be the Bihar Chief Minister’s understanding of the man on whose account he unilaterally broke his long-standing alliance with the BJP, the fact remains that the Bihar administration had an obligation to ensure the safe and peaceful conduct of the Hunkar rally. He claims to have done so but facts suggest otherwise.

The conduct of the state administration is revealing. First, it put obstacles in the way of the BJP holding the rally in the whole of the Gandhi Maidan. Secondly, it invited the President of India to be in Patna on the same day as the Hunkar rally, knowing fully well that the President’s security drill would create near-insurmountable obstacles in the path of those wishing to attend the rally. Thirdly, in an act of astonishing churlishness, the Bihar Government let it be known that it neither possessed bulletproof SUVs or jammers for Modi’s use. In short, the Bihar Government put out a clear message to its officers that Modi being an unwelcome guest, it wasn’t necessary to oblige the BJP.

It was this attitude that led to not more than six constables being deputed for sanitising the Gandhi Maidan on the day prior to the rally, the complete absence of any CCTV cameras at Gandhi Maidan and the absence of any senior police officer at the rally site last Sunday. Nor, for that matter did the Bihar Police have any emergency evacuation plans ready, not even after the bombs had started going off. There was no bomb disposal unit present at the venue to even take care of the explosives that had been detected by the crowd.

If my personal respect for Nitish Kumar wasn’t so high, I would even have suggested that he wanted the rally to end in chaos. What he probably didn’t calculate was that his antipathy would be picked up by the terrorists to try and turn chaos into disaster.  

ASIAN AGE, November 1, 2013


Exponential Graph said...

Nitish is opportunistic and doing same vote bank politics which congress, SP and CPM are doing and keeping India, UP and Bengal in era of poverty respectively.

Manoj Agarwal said...

Sir, please while writing on national issues, don't say you have reached at conclusion A or B due to your personal equation with the person concerned. You may draw whatever conclusions, but not due to such reasons..

Anonymous said...

While pitted against Jagannath Mishras & Laloo Yadavs , Nitish Kumar might emerge "preferable" . That is all to say about Nitish Kumar.

He is CERTAINLY not a noble hearted guileless person like Sri.Narendra Modi.

For a long time this wily Nitish Kumar was very fond of using the word "secular" while describing himself. Thus he conveyed the message to muslims & converted christians of India PLUS the congress.

When Yasin Bhatkal was arrested by Gujarat Police this Nitish Kumar was desperate insisting that he be handed over to Bihar police. The nexus between Yasin Bhatkal & the Indian Mujahideens who exploded bombs during Hunkar Rally would all have been eclipsed by Nitish Kumar & congress shindes & salman khurshids. With such an ignoble intention P.Chidambaram brought out some bill ( that the centre would have unbridled powers in tinkering at state level in the name of national security) that was shot down instantly by Jayalalithaa & Narendra Modi.

Despite all such repeated terrorist acts by certain muslims & their appeasers WITHIN India why are doctors giving medical treatment & the lawyers defending them & police letting them "escape"??

In ARAB countries such a soft laid back approach is unthinkable. Hindus of India are much SAFER in Middle Eastern countries & CHINA.

As there are no DMK , DK , congress , communists , nitish kumars , mulayam singh yadavs , samuel rajasekara reddys his dynasty , shah rukh khans pampered by SM Krishnas , sachin tendulkars shabana azmis pampered by congress, patnaik of Odisha another christian appeaser oops "secular" politician etc.

This is the most important reason Governance is excellent in countries like Kuwait , UAE & Oman.

The malady of India is its politicians.

r ranjan said...

well put in words sir,i wonder how media fails to reports the romance nitish is having with various modules of darbhanga,madhubani a bihari its shamefull for me to say this but nitish is indeed worse than lalu,he exhibits personality traits of egoist,opputunist.he has taken the people of nihar for granted and he thinks that we the people are fools and dont understand politics.I thank u for such detailed analysis and thank god for not turning gandhi maidan into red river

prakash kotker said...

Swapan baba, your personal high regard of NiKu should not come in the way of telling the truth as it is.Why veiled inferences? you are a journo,show you are one with guts and not hankering after moolah envelopes.NiKu is guilty of criminal negligence and that's it.
You are proving that @Mediacrooks is correct in denouncing you!

OG said...

Nitish Kumar has got his package from the planning commision a substiantial sum. It was at a price - do not issue a visa to Na Mo for entry into Bihar (must have pleased the Americans & Italians no end), interfere needlessly in another party's affairs and denounce Na Mo being selected as a PM Candidate - lanka kisiki, Biwi kisi ki aur Nitish aapni puch...... (what a laugh the foreigners must be having.)
Why is he panicking? He need not - he too has done a commendable job in his state with the very people he has cast away - I guess his people know it hence the panic. A balanced Sharad Yadav's advise was ignored by NK. Has it added to the degree of panic??
Hats off to the people who were present at the rally. The stampeed would have most certainly caused more damage. Whoever planted the explosives must be a disappointed person. Well done the people of Bihar attending the rally. You held your own- we the Indians must learn from you.

Anonymous said...

Absolutely agree!

Bhaskar said...

"The aftermath of the chaos could even have led to rioting in the streets of Patna." - Who/what exactly was in your mind when you said this ?