Total Pageviews

Follow by Email

Sunday, November 1, 2015

Indian Right has risen. Now who's the 'Stupid Party'?

By Swapan Dasgupta

 

Some years ago, while researching for an article on Australia, I came upon an observation by Pru Goward, a journalist-turned-politician of the ruling Liberal Party, that has a bearing on today’s Indian politics. “Conservative governments”, she wrote, “don’t have natural supporters who are articulate and philosophical writers. The conservative intellectual group is very small in Australia. So the politicians are lonely and they are joked about all the time.” 

 

What Goward observed about Australia can be said to be true for much of today’s democratic world. In Britain, the Conservatives have for long been derided as the “stupid party” and even the “nasty party.” Margaret Thatcher was denied an honorary doctorate by the dons of Oxford University—an astonishing act of petty-mindedness. Today, the Left-inclined cartoonists paint Prime Minister David Cameron and his Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne as variants of the upper-class twits portrayed in Monty Python skits. In the US, Ronald Reagan, arguably the architect of one of the most transformative presidencies after Franklin Roosevelt, was unendingly mocked for his ‘simple’ beliefs that were said to have derived more from John Wayne movies than the tomes of Adam Smith—a caricature that was also extended to George W. Bush. 

 

In India, thanks to Jawaharlal Nehru’s self-image as the enlightened, cosmopolitan socialist, his conservative opponents were painted as provincial bumpkins riddled with obscurantist priorities that ranged from cow protection to Ayurveda. To this was added the social disdain of the ‘progressive’ for the dhoti-clad bania, the supposed epitome of a commercially-minded ‘Hindu Right.’ When the Cambridge-educated Congress MP taunted the ‘chaiwala’ credentials of Narendra Modi he was simply mirroring attitudes the Nehruvian order tried to implant as common sense. This perverse common sense often masquerades as the modern alternative to India’s larger cultural inheritance.

 

The appeal of patrician socialism may well have diminished over the decades, but the projection of the ideological ‘Other’ as stupid, socially regressive and aesthetically unsound has persisted. Indeed, it has made a dramatic re-entry into the public discourse in recent months following the outbreak of the culture wars. The editorial pages of newspapers are replete with outbursts against the simple-minded ‘Hindu Right’ that has failed to understand the metaphors of Hinduism, the complexities of the historical process, diverse food habits and the ‘idea of India.’ In a recent article, a historian who made his mark in the echo chamber of Jawaharlal Nehru University asserted that the “Hindutva brigade has… failed to produce any notable professional historian. The new developments in the discipline have passed them by.” In short, the intellectual ecosystem of the Indian Right is seriously deficient and unworthy of being taken seriously by “professional” scholars. 

 

That the Indian Right has been preoccupied with political activism rather than creating an alternative intellectual tradition isn’t in doubt. However, much of this failure can be attributed to the fact that the scholastic environment in Indian universities since the late-1960s has been unrelentingly hostile to anything inimical to the liberal and Marxist paradigm. The element of group-think was so marked that non-conformists such as the writer Nirad Chaudhury and the economist Jagdish Bhagwati found living in India quite suffocating: they became intellectual refugees from progressivism. Traditional disciplines centred on classical studies underwent such derision and neglect that Sanskrit studies survive today courtesy institutions in the West. The result: India’s ‘traditional intellectuals’ were completely marginalised from the intellectual mainstream. 

 

It is worth remembering that this systematic destruction of traditional knowledge systems didn’t take place only under British rule; the trend persisted in post-Independent India under the spurious guise of implanting a ‘scientific temper’. 

 

That despite the absence of a level playing field, the Indian Right with a culturalist agenda (and commitment to economic deregulation) has grown exponentially over the past decades is significant. It suggests that when proffered a real choice, Indians are more inclined to put their faith in rooted traditions—particularly those grounded in traditional value systems, the family structure, collective historical memory and what can loosely be called common decencies. 

 

For too long, Indian conservatism has been at the receiving end of condescension and caricature. It may now be time to turn the notions of stupidity upside down. 

Sunday Times of India, November 1, 2015

 


6 comments:

samir kumar chakrabarty said...

Wonderful blog.

Jashan said...

As usual as the things done by right of typical rant. They didn't allow us here, everyone is against us and bla. The right in my honest opinion does not intellectual level to put valid arguments. Two people in BJP who I know wrote books - Arun Shourie and Jaswant Singh are not both out of party. They cannot tolerate people with logic. And in India what is amazing that the so called padhi likhi middle class is actually the padhe likhe anpad who support the right. Pity the Indians

Anonymous said...

Which English dictionary defines a Leftist as a Marxist?(I remember , the dictionary says that a Leftist is one who has modern ideas). Now that Communism and Socialism have been proved to be obsolete ideas, now, only an anti Communist should be called leftist while since the socialists still cling to the worn out idea of socialism, they should be called rightists
Next, the dictionary says Rightist means one who holds conservative views but in India, this word means one who supports Hinduism(this implies that Islam is a leftist religion. Is this acceptable?)
Similarly, no dictionary defined a fascist as a pro HInduism person but in India this word means only this.

Unknown said...

Keep going Swapan da!

SatyaK said...

The "Idea of India" is too catchy a phrase for the effete Anglophillic Indian class to let go. Like all half-baked ideas that they like to add to their repertoire this too is one of them. There are several oddities that this "idea" contains:

1. this phrase when bandied about in the context of bashing Modi and the Hindu right, is meant to denote a system and values that are not democratic, or promoting individual rights. Isn't it a contradiction when it is quoted frequently by congressmen who are themselves denied their right of free speech in Congress party; where the leader is never elected but the post is an inheritance passed from generation to generation. What "Idea of India" can such a party promote?

2. the idea was never really an idea, in the sense of being an intellectual construct. It is just another name cooked by the meek and ineffective anglicized class to pass centuries of failure to uphold and protect indigenous Indian culture and religions, from the onslaught of Islamic invasions and European colonization. When a nation is helpless in fighting back ruthless Islamic invasions, its efforts to couch the defeat and destruction of its culture, forced conversions of its people, destruction of its temples and other cultural monuments, as somehow a voluntary acceptance of an alien culture in the spirit of tolerance is laughable. I think all right minded western intellectuals (since that is the intended audience of the secularists) see the "idea of India" as really "the state of affairs of a conquered India", an inevitable consequence of defeat. For multi-culturalism and tolerance must be real, they must be the directions sought by victorious and brave nations (like Germany or USA) who aren't afraid to face their enemies and defeat them; not from a cowardly people that avoid conflict at any cost.

I hope the BJP and RSS take this opportunity to put the "rightful" agenda on a permanent and aesthetic intellectual foundation and nurture individuals and institutions to carry this forward. They must identify and groom young leaders to disseminate the conservative right ideology.

raghupavan said...

Excellent timing and see how the Indian Youth will understand the value of traditional systems and they will not leave any stone unturned. and i feel after living in USA for 2 years , in India we were leading a second class version of BHARAT - not the genuine one. As a child at school , this Nehruvian brigade didnt allow me to learn or respect my correct history, also the culture. with the rise of Technology , now i could access it, tap & get back to my roots. I am happy that what my heart said is always true.. I want to make INDIA ---> BHARAT!