Total Pageviews

Follow by Email

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Khattar's Gurugram is in Haryana, not in California

By Swapan Dasgupta


To many of the cosmopolitans resident (or working) in Gurgaon, Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar is a figure of ridicule. This is not on account of his party affiliation or because he was an unexpected choice for the top job after the BJP won power in Haryana. To those educated in the older English-medium schools, Khattar often appears the stereotype of the Sanskrit teacher, the proverbial Pandey-ji who was the resident oddity. His stern and somewhat archaic demeanour has conflicted sharply with the ethos of the gated, high-rise buildings. Khattar epitomised an aspect of the old Punjabi Haryana while the beautiful people working in glass-fronted offices imagined they were in California. 


In view of this cultural schism, it is understandable that the reaction of social media to the abrupt renaming of Gurgaon to Gurugram was accompanied by a blend of mirth and outrage. Gurugram, it was proclaimed, was the newest addition to the long list of name changes that the ‘dhotiwalas’ (an archaic term that conveys the sense) and cultural xenophobes had forced on Global India. There was, of course, a small difference. The junking of Gurgaon wasn’t exactly an act of armchair anti-colonialism; it was more a linguistic purification and a turn away from the colloquial. No doubt it also assaulted the rustic ‘Gurgawan’, preferred by those the beautiful people see as today’s ‘criminal tribes’, but it also deflated the handful that preferred calling Delhi’s extension as ‘Gerzhen.’


Name changes, however innocuous, are often a source of momentary inconvenience. Moreover, among a particular class, the persistence with the old name, even the archaic, is often a political statement—a proclamation of detachment from the vernacular. Yet, it is interesting to juxtapose the curious love of Gurgaon as both a city and brand name with the names of the upscale residential complexes that define this corner of Haryana. A glance at a property portal for Gurgaon revealed some names of the high-rise residential buildings: Casa Bella, Tulip Violet, Palm Drive, The Verandas, Merlin, Victory Valley, Palm Springs, The Primus, La Lagune, The Belaire, et al. The nearest to an Indian name was Vaatika. 


The mismatch between the professed elite fascination for the Haryanvi colloquial and their preferred building names couldn’t be starker. Maybe the contrived outrage would have been less voluble had the State Government opted for a name that would have fitted easily into a more ‘international’ (euphemism for American) environment. As it is, the only Indian feature of the Gurgaon architecture is the people who live or work in the buildings. And many of them try to pretend otherwise, except during cricket matches.


As controversies go, the storm over Gurugram is likely to blow over quickly. However, the mere fact that it agitates a section of the chattering classes is revealing. The real problem, it seems to me, is not that a variant of the ‘little tradition’ is being subsumed by a Sanskrit-centric ‘high culture’ but that the inspiration for resurrecting an old name has come from Indian mythology. 


A local belief that Dronacharya’s gurukul where both the Pandavas and Kauravas were instructed in the martial arts was located in Gurgaon is the basis of the new name. This in itself is not a new phenomenon as many Indian places are named around local beliefs centred on the Epics. Indeed, the historical lineage of Gurgaon and Gurugram are exactly the same, except that some find gram easier to pronounce than gaon.


The protests over commemorating Dronacharya, a guru who was guilty of favouritism and social prejudice, are also contrived. The Mahabharata, unlike the Ramayana, is not about the ideal man. It focuses on ethical and moral conflicts faced in the pursuit of dharma. Dronacharya was an accomplished guru but he was not an individual who is a public role model. Gurugram merely links a place to India’s own tradition of ithihasa. It is a facet of what is called “sacred geography.”


Gurgaon-Gurugram is a needless controversy that, however, has a way out. The Constitution also provides for two place names to exist simultaneously and without attaching value judgments. If India can also be Bharat, Gurgaon and Gurugram can coexist without inviting anguish or turbulence. The country has bigger battles to fight, even in Gurugram. 

Sunday Times of India, April 17, 2016



Anonymous said...

There is no nation on this planet that has a so called intelligentsia that looks down on its own culture , except India. How does one recognise these misfits? They generally went to 'convent', missionary schools and studied in English medium schools. By and large they are well to do and pretend that everything hindu is backward. They copy anything and everything western and assume it to be superior to anything 'desi. When I lived in England, Indians were referred to pejoritively by the racists there as 'wogs'. I soon learnt that this was initially an acronym for
'Western Oriented Gentleman'. I submit that all forward thinking Indians should start referring to these nincompoops as wogs.

SatyaK said...

Human nature resists change: from the times during the birth of the industrial revolution when spinning jenny was ridiculed down to this day when age old organic farming is preferred to GMO or other modern farming methods. However, the protesting class is duplicitous and enormously short sighted. This is the class that likes to Anglicise or Americanise nearly everything. For instance their nick names are heavily anglicised: why else would there be Bobby's as in Bobby Singh, or a David Dhawan or a Neil (note the spelling) Nitin Mukesh; also for instance the names of pets: their domestic dogs are almost always given English names such as Roxy, Betsy, etc One can quote a plethora of such Anglophilic evidences of this class.

So in light of their own subliminal preferences for the phoren why do they protest this name change? Is being rustic the coolest thing in the west now, hence the love of -gaon over -gram? I claim that gurugram is a lot more "hip" and pphoren than "gurugaon, for you can pronounce it the way tele-gram is pronounced and flows easily in our English infested local dialiects also, let alone in English.

But this protest doesn't have a logic of a stylistic sort. At the heart of the matter is that this class which lives a vicarious western life doesn't want to be told by the dhotiwallah, even if he be the chief minister, about anything in their lives. I suspect they rather someone like Sonia Gandhi to suggest such name changes. For then it is phoren approved.

SatyaK said...

This is off topic:

Since there is no other way to address Shri Swapan Dasgupta directly I'm using this forum:

First of all, congratulations on being nominated for the Rajya Sabha! I hope the level of debate elevates with your entry into it. That said, do you intend to continue maintaining this blog? or will you be busy with parliamentary duties.

arjun said...

thanks for sharing.. keep updating.

Unknown said...

Haha, this slavery for phoren is the reason why sonia has been able to rule us for so long.